Senior Software Engineer, AI Training - დისტანციური ვაკანსია

G2i Inc. ეძებს სპეციალისტს პოზიციაზე Senior Software Engineer, AI Training - სენიორ დონე, ანუ დამსაქმებელი მოელის, რომ გადაწყვეტილებებს დამოუკიდებლად მიიღებთ. ვაკანსია IT და პროგრამირება-ის მიმართულებისაა და სრულად დისტანციურია. კომპანიას კანდიდატის ადგილმდებარეობა შეზღუდული არ აქვს, ამიტომ განაცხადს საქართველოდან შეიტანთ.

განცხადებაში ნახსენები ძირითადი ინსტრუმენტებია: Python, TypeScript. რეზიუმეში სწორედ ამ უნარების კონკრეტული მაგალითები უნდა გამოჩნდეს.

დამსაქმებელმა ანაზღაურება საჯაროდ მიუთითა: $100 - $200 საათში. სამუშაო საათებზე განცხადება პირობას არ აწესებს.

ეს ვაკანსია ავტომატურ შემოწმებას გადის: სიაში არ ხვდება განცხადება, რომელიც ითხოვს უცხო ქვეყნის სამუშაო ნებართვას, ვიზის სპონსორობას, კონკრეტული ქვეყნის მოქალაქეობას ან იქ ცხოვრებას.

Contract | Remote, worldwide | $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location | 10-20 hrs/week Please note that eligibility may vary depending on your location, as some regions may not be supported by the client. Check out this Loom video for more details: We're looking for highly experienced software engineer (SR+) to help evaluate the quality of interactions with modern coding agents such as OpenAI Codex and Claude Code. This is not a traditional engineering role. You won't be writing production code. You'll be evaluating something harder: whether the model thinks like a great engineer. What this role actually is You will assess how AI coding agents behave in real-world scenarios, focusing on: • Whether the response makes sense

* Whether the preamble and reasoning are useful

* Whether the output reflects strong engineering judgment

* Whether the interaction feels right to an experienced developer

This role is about engineering taste. Syntax correctness is the easy part. What you'll be doing

* Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end to end

* Judge whether outputs are useful, correct at a high level, and aligned with how a strong engineer would think

* Assess the quality of explanations and reasoning, not just the code

* Distinguish between levels of response quality (what makes something a 2 vs a 4)

* Give clear, opinionated feedback in writing on what worked, what didn't, and what felt off or misleading

* Help define what great looks like when working with tools like Cursor, Codex and Claude Code

What we mean by "taste" We're looking for engineers who can answer questions like:

* Does this feel like something a strong engineer would actually say?

* Is this explanation helpful, or just technically correct?

* Is the model guiding the user well, or just dumping output?

* Would this interaction build or erode trust?

You should be comfortable making subjective but rigorous judgments, and explaining them clearly. Who you are

* Senior, Staff or Principal-level engineer (or equivalent experience)

* Strong background in TypeScript/JavaScript or Python

* Hands-on experience with at least one of OpenAI Codex, Claude Code or Cursor

* Deep familiarity with modern AI-assisted dev workflows

* Able to evaluate code without executing it or reviewing every line

* Strong written and spoken English (B2 or above). You'll be writing detailed feedback and recording short video explanations, so this is a hard requirement

* Comfortable giving direct, opinionated feedback

* High bar for what good engineering looks like

Nice to have

* Prior exposure to prompt design or evaluation workflows

* Experience mentoring senior engineers or defining engineering standards

Engagement details

* Rate: $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location

• Hours: 10-20 hours/week, flexible

* Duration: ongoing. Projects run from about two weeks to a few months each, and we offer new ones to evaluators who do well

* Start: as soon as you clear the take-home and a project has an open seat

* Process: one take-home evaluation exercise with a recorded Loom walkthrough. No interview

Originally posted on Himalayas